BLOG

Name the Rule  The next time you miss something obvious, write the rule your attention was following. Ignoring is rarely random. Test Without Notes  Before reviewing anything, write what you remember from memory. Check after. The gap shows what stuck. Pull or Push Check  When distracted, ask: was my attention pulled by salience or pushed […]

We notice what feels relevant to “us.” Similarity sharpens attention; distance dulls it. This isn’t malice… it’s efficiency. Your mind allocates resources where payoff has historically been highest. The problem is that this shortcut doesn’t stay neutral. Over time, it shapes what changes you detect, whose mistakes stand out, and which stories feel plausible. When

You don’t store everything because you don’t have to. Often, the smartest memory strategy is outsourcing. Instead of encoding every detail, your mind relies on the environment to hold it. Look again instead of remember. Check instead of store. This works because the world is stable enough… most of the time. Problems arise when we

Sometimes your attention is stolen. Sometimes it’s deployed. Both feel the same from the inside, but they come from different sources. One is pulled by what stands out. The other is pushed by what you decide matters. Trouble starts when we confuse them. We blame ourselves for distraction when the environment is engineered to grab

If you noticed everything, you’d be useless. Attention isn’t a camera; it’s a gatekeeper. Its job is not to capture reality but to select it. When you miss a change right in front of you, it feels like failure. But it’s closer to budgeting. Minds that try to encode everything burn out fast. So the

Inspect the Effortless  Pick one task you do instantly. Write down three hidden steps that must be happening. If you struggle, that’s the point. Prefer the Predictive Model  Compare two explanations. Choose the one that makes a risky prediction. Bet on usefulness over elegance. Feature Hunt  Take an object you recognize easily. List its features

Strip away the mystique and cognition has a simple core: symbols, operations, and interpretation. Symbols stand in for the world. Operations transform them. Interpretation puts them back into action. That loop (again and again) is thinking. Once you see this, the line between human and machine gets uncomfortable. Not because machines are magical, but because

A good model doesn’t end curiosity. It multiplies it. Once you adopt a structured explanation, new questions appear automatically. What would be confusing? What would break if a connection failed? What errors should cluster together? This is the quiet power of modeling. It doesn’t just describe behavior… it suggests experiments, predicts errors, and points to

Inputs don’t decide outcomes. Representations do. The same external reality can be encoded in multiple ways… and each encoding unlocks different operations. That’s why changing how something is represented can instantly change what’s possible. If you’re stuck, the issue is rarely raw information. It’s the format your mind is using to hold it. Images invite

Which explanation do you trust… the elegant one or the useful one? Clean stories are comforting. They feel rational. But cognition doesn’t care about comfort. It cares about performance. Sometimes the model that sounds ridiculous explains reality better than the one that sounds tidy. That’s a warning sign worth respecting. If your explanation needs endless